Inspection software
for industrial operations
Inspect controls your operation's inspections: who ran them, what they found and who verified the correction.
The problem it solves
- 01 Execution is not verifiable. A signed form does not distinguish between an inspection that was performed and one that was recorded as performed.
- 02 Follow-up depends on individuals. A finding reported over messaging has no assigned owner, no deadline and no record of closure.
- 03 Information arrives late. Non-compliance surfaces in the monthly review, once correction has stopped being preventive.
- 04 Evidence is rebuilt. Facing an audit, a customer claim or an incident, the file is assembled by hand from scattered records.
- 05 Administrative cost is permanent. Transcribing forms, sorting photographs and assembling reports consumes hours that add no control.
How it works
Six stages. Each one records who acted, when, and with what evidence.
- 01System
Scheduling
The schedule generates the inspection obligation for each site, asset and date, and assigns it to a user or a role.
- 02Inspector
Execution
The inspector receives the day's work in the Android application or the browser. Captures answers, photographs, location and signature.
- 03System
Scoring
The server evaluates the capture against the published template version and issues the result. The criteria do not depend on whoever inspects.
- 04System
Finding
Each failed point generates a finding with severity, an assigned owner and a resolution deadline set by the active policy.
- 05Owner
Correction
The owner documents the corrective action and attaches evidence. The finding is declared resolved, not closed.
- 06Verifier
Verification
A different identity confirms the correction is sufficient. Until then the cycle stays open.
The resulting file is reproducible: it retains the template version, the answers, the evidence, the signatures and every state change with its author and date.
The value it generates
Four measurable effects on the operation and on the financial result.
Administrative work that disappears
The file is complete when the inspection closes, with photographs, signatures and result. No later transcription, no manual report assembly, no follow-up over email or messaging.
Failures handled before the stoppage
A critical deviation generates a finding with a deadline and escalation from the moment it is recorded. Correction happens inside the window where it still prevents the stoppage, the rework or the rejected batch.
Faster delivery and invoicing
Companies that sell inspection or maintenance deliver the report the same day, invoice sooner and serve more jobs with the same staff. Formal evidence also qualifies them for contracts that require it.
Operation status without asking for it
Overdue inspections, open findings, compliance by site, area and owner. Management reads the status in one view, without requesting reports or waiting for month-end.
Why Inspect
- Compared to
Paper, spreadsheets and messaging
The obligation does not depend on memory
The schedule generates every inspection as its own record, whether or not anyone runs it. An inspection that was not performed stays visible and attributable: it does not disappear by going unfilled.
- Compared to
Checklist applications
The record is not altered and does not close itself
Whoever inspects does not approve their own submission. Whoever resolves a finding does not verify it. What is submitted is not edited: a correction creates a successor record linked to the original. The server evaluates these conditions before accepting the operation, and stacking roles does not switch them off.
- Compared to
The inspection module of an ERP or a CMMS
Full cycle without opening the core system
Inspect covers versioned templates, scheduling, capture, evidence, findings, SLA and verification. It runs autonomously and, where a CMMS exists, hands the finding over without duplicating work orders, spare parts or costs.
What it includes
Whoever designs the inspections
- Template editor with inspection points, numeric tolerances, criticality and conditional logic.
- Evidence required by condition: always, on failure or on critical failure, with minimums and maximums per file type.
- Signatures required by role and meaning.
- Publication with a frozen version and revision control: modifying a template creates a new version and does not alter inspections already performed.
- Six corporate templates included: area safety, pre-operational machinery, fire extinguishers, lockout/tagout, 5S and maintenance closeout.
Whoever schedules the work
- Recurrence by site, area and asset, with its own time zone per schedule.
- Assignment to a named user or to a role, claimed by an eligible inspector.
- Pause, resume and retire schedules without affecting work already generated.
- On-demand generation when an inspection is needed outside the calendar.
- Visible exceptions when an inspection cannot be generated, with cause, attempts and resolution.
Whoever inspects
- Native Android application and browser, with the day's work in a single queue.
- Offline operation: capture continues without network and synchronizes on reconnection, without duplicating or losing work.
- Capture of photograph, video, audio and document, with location and reading time.
- Inspector signature bound to their authenticated identity.
- Recording of deviations not anticipated by the template, with their own evidence.
Whoever supervises and audits
- Review and approval of submissions by an identity independent from whoever inspected.
- Finding triage with severity, owner and deadline; automatic escalation on expiry.
- Corrective actions with owner, committed date and evidence of completion.
- Risk acceptance with authority, reason and validity, which reopens the finding on expiry.
- PDF file and immutable audit log of every transition, with actor, date and reason.
Deployment and security
- 01 Dedicated instance per customer: database, evidence storage and domain of its own. No shared infrastructure between companies.
- 02 Mandatory two-factor authentication and session policies configurable per organization.
- 03 Granular permissions down to field and record level, with separate roles to design, publish, schedule, inspect, review, resolve and verify.
- 04 Immutable audit log: every transition retains actor, date, previous state and new state.
- 05 OWASP Top 10 mitigation verified on every release, encryption in transit and at rest, automated backups and continuous monitoring.
- 06 Multi-plant and multi-branch operation from the ground up.
Rollout
The instance is delivered configured with its own domain, users, roles and the corporate templates active. Operation starts with the inspections the company already runs today, loaded into the editor and published; from that point the schedule generates the work without intervention. The usual timeline is weeks.
Schedule a demonstrationOperation profile
- 01 One hundred or more inspections per month.
- 02 Several shifts, areas, plants or branches.
- 03 Photograph, signature or document as a mandatory part of the record.
- 04 Findings that must be assigned to an owner and formally closed.
- 05 Audits before customers, certifiers or authorities.
- 06 Mandatory separation between whoever inspects, whoever corrects and whoever verifies.
- 07 Manufacturing, agribusiness, infrastructure, logistics and facilities management.
Frequently asked questions
Is Inspect a CMMS?
No. Inspect covers the inspection cycle: templates, scheduling, capture, evidence, findings, deadlines and verification. It does not manage work orders, technicians, spare parts or maintenance costs. It runs autonomously and, where a company already has a CMMS, hands the finding over without duplicating its domain.
What is used to run inspections in the field?
The native Android application or the browser. The application delivers the inspector's work for the day, captures answers, photographs, video, location and signature, and operates without connectivity: capture continues offline and synchronizes on reconnection, without duplicating or losing work.
Can we use the inspection formats we already have?
Yes. The editor builds any template: points with numeric tolerances, killer questions, conditional logic, evidence required by condition and signatures required by role. The instance is also delivered with six corporate templates active.
What happens if nobody runs a scheduled inspection?
It stays on record as a pending, attributable obligation. The schedule generates each inspection's occurrence whether or not anyone runs it, so non-compliance is queryable by site, area and owner.
Who can verify a finding?
An identity other than whoever ran the inspection and whoever performed the correction. The server evaluates that separation by identity, not by permissions: stacking roles does not enable anyone to verify their own work.
How does it integrate with the systems we already run?
Inspect requires no prior system to operate. Where a CMMS exists, it publishes the eligible finding so that system generates its work order, and retains only the reference and external status needed to decide whether the finding can be verified.
How is it deployed?
As a dedicated instance per customer: database, evidence storage and domain of its own, with no shared infrastructure between companies. It is delivered configured with users, roles and templates active.